Tiberian Tide - A concept to make CNC story "gel"(
#21
Posted 25 May 2004 - 02:41 PM
By the way, Allies also had clonning technology. Its impossible that Tanya only seems five years older when about 30 years passed, lol.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#22
Posted 25 May 2004 - 02:42 PM
After all, the Chronosphere and Iron Curtain had both been invented once. Why the heck would you invent them AGAIN?
I think that storyline was just a way of getting people into the "Sequel" mode. Through the use of a few recurrences (Einstein, Soviet invasions, Chronosphere and Iron Curtain), they try to give the idea that they're connected.
Personally, I reckon we can erase RA2 from the storyline conjunction. It has no relevance to the Red Alert story, and it has none with the Tiberian story either. Even though I involved it in my Kane-was-cloned idea, I really think RA2 is a bit more of a cash-in than an actual sequel.
If we were to erase RA2, then making the two slot together becomes a little bit easier, IMO...
#25
Posted 26 May 2004 - 11:28 AM
#26
Posted 26 May 2004 - 07:42 PM
#27
Posted 26 May 2004 - 07:53 PM
I'm sure in one of the mission videos it is made clear the RA2 tanya is the RA1 tanya's daughter, or I might have just read that on the internet.By the way, Allies also had clonning technology. Its impossible that Tanya only seems five years older when about 30 years passed, lol.
#28
Posted 27 May 2004 - 04:31 AM
#30
Posted 27 May 2004 - 04:47 AM
#31
Posted 27 May 2004 - 04:50 AM
#33
Posted 27 May 2004 - 01:44 PM
#35
Posted 28 May 2004 - 09:45 AM
I thought they went back to PREVENT WW2???
Back on topic, yeah.
AG is right about the RA2 date, its one of the papers that fly around in one of videos i think. RA1 is somewhere between 1946/1950, AFAICR.
Margret Thatcher - Fenring's the one for me
#36
Posted 28 May 2004 - 11:00 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users