AMEN TO THAT!!!Statistics are stupid...
Canterbury Sufficiently.... Gay?
#41
Posted 16 July 2009 - 06:16 AM
#42
Posted 16 July 2009 - 08:57 AM
It's not a fact though. Maybe of the people surveyed, there were 10% of people were gay. But that survey was probably 20% of earth's population. Statistics are stupid...
Then you figure out the standard deviation from sample size versus affected size of populations. Don't be a tard.
Also, those statistics are bastardized to all hell, they're from Kinsey. His research showed about 10% of males were homosexual... but that also only about 10% of males were heterosexual. This is in the absolute though... and his actual extrapolations in terms of ratios was probably off.
I think western world rates of homosexuality are between 6% and 12%, depending heavily on area.
#43
Posted 16 July 2009 - 09:44 PM
#44
Posted 18 July 2009 - 10:44 AM
#45
Posted 19 July 2009 - 06:12 PM
Wow... Rattus, haven't seen you around in a long time.. hope your doing well!
#46
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:09 AM
Ratt is always around. We haven't seen YOU around Dan. Where the heck have YOU been?
*Segwaying back into the topic*
Wow... that Canterbury sure is gay.
#47
Posted 05 September 2009 - 11:54 AM
yes I do, sometimes randomly appear back in topics that I ignore for 3 pages or soHuh?
Ratt is always around. We haven't seen YOU around Dan. Where the heck have YOU been?
*Segwaying back into the topic*
Wow... that Canterbury sure is gay.
#48
Posted 05 September 2009 - 04:08 PM
#49
Posted 10 September 2009 - 12:47 PM
No, races aren't 'cultures' either, nor religions. Tolerance and acceptance of differences is one thing. Pandering to minorities and giving them benefits over the majority is quite another. The problem is, out gutless, spineless government has a distinct habit of doing just that.
I am a white male, of average height and build, with no disabilities or medical conditions save a minor astigmatism in one eye and no spleen. I am irreligious, heterosexual and am of university-level intelligence. I have both my arms and legs, am 21 years of age, a full head of hair and no children.
I am, by every measure, the person that my government will help least. Because I'm not black, old, disabled, muslim, burdened with children or gay, the government will do nothing to promote tolerance of me. All these groups have no right to demand special treatment, because positive discrimination is still discrimination.
#50
Posted 10 September 2009 - 04:50 PM
#51
Posted 10 September 2009 - 05:50 PM
#52
Posted 10 September 2009 - 06:53 PM
#53
Posted 10 September 2009 - 07:29 PM
You forgot heterosexual. Unless, of course you aren't, in which case fair enough.
#54
Posted 10 September 2009 - 09:42 PM
#55
Posted 21 September 2009 - 12:49 PM
I am, by every measure, the person that my government will help least. Because I'm not black, old, disabled, muslim, burdened with children or gay, the government will do nothing to promote tolerance of me. All these groups have no right to demand special treatment, because positive discrimination is still discrimination.
...
Go fuck yourself. Hard. Sideways.
You know it's bad when other white guys eyeroll so hard they bleed when you bitch about reverse racism and how you're so goddamned butthurt because nobody gives you special treatment as an argument against any and all special treatment. That's like being vegetarian because nobody will cook a nice steak for you. It's selfishness of the privileged, rage of the enfranchised.
Also, I have never disclosed to any government representative my sexuality. I never got a check or a free wave into a job for sucking dick. The only two governmental functions I can think about that involve sexuality still are military service (gays get fucked) and marriage/civ unions (gays get fucked in most states). Is this about the old hate-crime thing, because I don't care if I get beat for being white, being gay or just because... I want the fuckers who did it to get prosecuted.
#56
Posted 21 September 2009 - 01:27 PM
There shouldn't be any equal opportunity forms requiring you to disclose these details; it should be purely down to the candidate's aptitude, not their race, sexuality, gender etc.
Do you honestly fucking think I'm so narrow-minded as to actually be prejudiced against you being gay, or anyone else being gay, or black, or because of what name they call God? Of course I don't think any of those things. It's not those groups I object to. It's the preferential treatment that our (particularly the British - I can't speak for America) government gives to these groups, and basically forsakes anyone who isn't in a minority or so-called underprivileged group.
I'm all for equality, but right now it's swung so far the other way that healthy white straight males are not treated as well as any other group, and so it has become unequal in the other direction.
I hope I have clarified my position somewhat.
#57
Posted 21 September 2009 - 01:28 PM
Fuck the Church.If people are enough smart,they can realize that God will help them even if they don't go to the Church.
Edited by Romanul, 21 September 2009 - 01:29 PM.
#58
Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:09 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#59
Posted 21 September 2009 - 06:53 PM
#60
Posted 21 September 2009 - 10:11 PM
In the Netherlands we have a situation where the government goes very far to please muslims, because:It's the preferential treatment that our (particularly the British - I can't speak for America) government gives to these groups, and basically forsakes anyone who isn't in a minority or so-called underprivileged group.
- They are afraid of the trouble some people in that group will otherwise cause
- And/or they want to get their votes
Einstein: "We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users