86 replies to this topic

[bullethead]

I was searching on the internet and I came across this link. Its about the pentagon attacks on 9/11. All you have to do is find the boeing in the pictures. Once people put their theories down Ill put mine down. Happy hunting.http://www.asile.org.../erreurs_en.htm

[Deathscythe1911]

Yeah its kind of amazing how the inner rings of the pentagon were undamaged.

[Allied General]

its even more amazing to think 9/11 could have caused so much damage... whats to stop a car bomb?

[Beowulf]

Thank God we have at least one sensible person on the forums.....

[Az3r^]

yeah hes made a good point ,

[Heero6528]

I'm not even sure it WAS a 757... I thought it was some small commercial plane that hit the pentagon... maybe I'm wrong, but I don't remember it being a big plane

[Az3r^]

i thought it was a passenger ?
a boeing or a plane of that size

[Heero6528]

nm... I looked it up... it was a 757... sorry

[Az3r^]

ah fair enough

[wilmet]

how resistant is the Pentagon ?
after all it is at the heart of US defense , is it possible that the damage caused by a planes hitting it was limited because of reinforced concrete (or whatever) ?

[Natus]

Well, in theory the pentagon is a well defended instalation due to its internal structure. It was composed of multiple layers placed in structually weak positions, therefore it was damage limatation. Or so i heard the story.

[MSpencer]

Well, the shear amount of jet fuel used in a 757-200 as used by AA as of 9/11/01 on Long Distance Transcontinental routes, the plane would be completely and utterly incinerated. And even if you had a car bomb, you'd need to be using a tractor trailer truck bomb filled with something like 5000lbs of C4 to make a DENT! The Pentagon was designed to withstand an attack from Air-launched cruise missiles coming from the Soviet made copy of the B29 and was subsequently upgraded to withstand the new AS-6 Kingfisher, designed by Soviet R&D in the 70s to cripple strategic targets.

Either that or a tac nuke...

[bullethead]

But that doesnt explain why there was no damage from the wings. and that it only cause damage on the ground level of the penegon. and the 757 is alot higher then the ground level and would of caused damage on the other floors...and if it only hit the ground level then that would mean that it had to of crashed on the ground first yet there was no visible evidence of the plane hitting the ground... :roll:

[MSpencer]

What, are you saying the US Government blew up the Pentagon? That's ABSURD!

[Tom]

What, are you saying the US Government blew up the Pentagon? That's ABSURD!

I'm not saying they did, I believe it was a 757 but the US Government aren't exactly the best at telling people what really happened. There has also been some conspiricies in the past too.

[cr@zyiv@n]

Yeah, like anyone knows Bin Laden and US go back in time, and those days the US supplied the Taliban with weapons to fight the Russians, they might as well have trained them...

And GWB 'War On Terror' needed a reason like this to start those wars, if you can't find a good reason, tell everybody they got nukes, if that doesn't work, tell everybody they are terrorists... :roll:

[Tom]

Nah go back futher than that, Talk about Kennedy. Now thats something that hasn't been fully proved, but i reckon it was a conspiricy. I mean why so much effort to keep things hidden.

[Beowulf]

What are you saying? The American government likes to lie and cover things up. Say it ain't so!

[Tom]

Well from what i believe, kenndy was shot in the front of the head not in the back. The 3 bullets Harvey Lee Oswald fired didn't hit him in the head. THats what i believe from seeing a video about it in a History class i taught once.