All about Twilight
#201
Posted 23 November 2009 - 08:15 PM
#202
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:34 AM
The symbolism in this picture makes me weep.
EDIT: That said, I'd consider it worse were it a picture of Chaucer, or Stoker.
Edited by mike_, 24 November 2009 - 12:35 AM.
#203
Posted 24 November 2009 - 12:39 PM
#205
Posted 24 November 2009 - 03:28 PM
#206
Posted 24 November 2009 - 09:24 PM
No fuel left for the pilgrims
#208
Posted 24 November 2009 - 11:59 PM
Why... why... whyyyyy does he have to be in the same picture as that kind of printed tripe?
Careful. This link is DANGEROUS. Do NOT click it. This one, however, is fine.
I had the meaning of life in my signature, but it exceeded the character limit.
#209
Posted 25 November 2009 - 02:27 PM
#210
Posted 25 November 2009 - 06:41 PM
Fuck you Ash, Stoker is awesome.
Hey I didn't say he was bad. I just said I didn't like his stuff. We're all entitled to our opinion, are we not? Sorry I don't live up to your intellectual standards...
#212
Posted 25 November 2009 - 07:31 PM
#213
Posted 25 November 2009 - 10:48 PM
#215
Posted 25 November 2009 - 11:48 PM
http://en.wikipedia....oldid=327225864
I'd seen it on the main page before Wiki's admins changed it back, but then found the previous edit link. So thar it be.
#216
Posted 26 November 2009 - 06:51 AM
My own mother is addicted to Twilight, and she even said New Moon was meh - the movies in production about the saga will most likely split the twitards into two groups : The Book-supporters, and the Movie-supporters.
EDIT: Even I watched the heap-o-shit of a movie - it's horribly drab, the characters are so fucking emotionless you'd believe they're all dead inside. To wrap it all up, the cheesy sparkles just scream a comical twist to vampires burning under the sun. All in all shallow and stupid. The only way I could even believe someone would love the franchise is for the awkward romance.
Edited by Spectre, 26 November 2009 - 06:59 AM.
#217
Posted 26 November 2009 - 11:10 AM
Gina R. Dalfonzo of the National Review Online described Edward's character as mentally unstable and a "predator", using behavioural examples such as spying on Bella while she sleeps, eavesdropping on her conversations, dictating her choice of friends, and encouraging her to deceive her father as reasons why she believes he is "one of modern fiction's best candidates for a restraining order."[30] Pattinson also criticizes the character, saying, ""If Edward wasn't a fictional character and you met him in reality he is like one of those guys who would probably be an axe murderer or something."[31]
Einstein: "We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
#218
Posted 26 November 2009 - 12:05 PM
That'd probably be bad for him, since the whole concept of 'turn undead' is that if you take a sleeping vampire and turn him upside-down in his coffin he will render him completely ineffectual and unable to leave the coffin (same as not inviting the vampire into your home renders him unable to enter - just remove the 'welcome' mat as it could be technically construed as an invitation)Somewhere, Dracula rolls in his grave.
#219
Posted 26 November 2009 - 07:33 PM
Oh my hell. The Twilight talk reminds me of this:
http://en.wikipedia....oldid=327225864
I'd seen it on the main page before Wiki's admins changed it back, but then found the previous edit link. So thar it be.
Hilarious
#220
Posted 27 November 2009 - 08:00 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users