421 replies to this topic

[StolenTech]

engineers repair bridges already, is it even possible to make them detonate them as well ?

Edited by StolenTech, 01 September 2018 - 03:29 PM.

[Tathmesh]

Maybe Foehn Engineers can get a Nanofiber Sync form that allows them to destroy bridges

[LordDesolator777]

Would it be possible to make it so when the AI surrenders in multiplayer any tech buildings they control don't automatically explode?

[Divine]

Maybe Foehn Engineers can get a Nanofiber Sync form that allows them to destroy bridges

That would actually make sense. Some say that the Foehn Engineer is not supposed to be special because that's how the world works and the world's rules are absolute...

Spoiler

[PACER]

 

Maybe Foehn Engineers can get a Nanofiber Sync form that allows them to destroy bridges

That would actually make sense. Some say that the Foehn Engineer is not supposed to be special because that's how the world works and the world's rules are absolute...

Spoiler

 

 

There is one single variant of Engis which can be healed by NanoCharge. Guess which.

[J00B]

Could the free for all logic from the New game mode be applied to No Bases?

 

If I try do a 7 AI FFA in this mode it feels like the player is ganged up on hard.

Edited by J00B, 04 September 2018 - 03:49 PM.

[OfficialLolicon]

Could the free for all logic from the New game mode be applied to No Bases?
 
If I try do a 7 AI FFA in this mode it feels like the player is ganged up on hard.

Ai just prioritizes ganging up players than other bots when possible.. It also happens in FFA (when I played, noticed it) so I see no difference if it also gets implemented in it.

[J00B]

It also happens in FFA (when I played, noticed it) so I see no difference if it also gets implemented in it.

I see. Maybe its purpose is for multiplayer, to restrict allying? Otherwise what good is it?

 

I suppose it's pretty unreasonable to ask for 'moar random AI' for No Bases, as the AI will be tweaked with time.

[Solais]

Next Ares version entered RC status, I think once it's released, 3.3.4. will follow suit.

[isaac103]

Next Ares version entered RC status, I think once it's released, 3.3.4. will follow suit.

Any idea what's new in this version of Ares? 

[Thesilver]

Part of me will miss the GGI rockets being shot out of windows, another part of me is glad that archers will work now in garrisons.

[Solais]

Stuff in the changelog is based on the new Ares features, I think.

[AlexB]

There's no nicely formatted list of all new features. I mention things I added to what 1.0 could do in the dev thread over at PPM.

In short: vehicles deploying into other vehicles types, or changing into other types when being promoted. Build times can be customized better, more spy effects, many other features expanded slightly. A lot of fixes and optimizations.

[GameMaster0000]

There's no nicely formatted list of all new features. I mention things I added to what 1.0 could do in the dev thread over at PPM.

In short: vehicles deploying into other vehicles types, or changing into other types when being promoted. Build times can be customized better, more spy effects, many other features expanded slightly. A lot of fixes and optimizations.

I wondering something, doesn't it's will be issue with type select?

[Handepsilon]

Ares has that covered : http://ares-develope...typeselect.html

Notice how you can type select engineers of different factions, or MCV + Conyard. Hell, you can type select FinAlize too

Edited by Handepsilon, 09 September 2018 - 12:17 PM.

[FixenFrøjte]

guys. can we stop pretending that pterenadons are fine? it doesnt matter how hardcore your anti air is - they destroy E V E R Y T H I N G.

 

also, since their introduction, i still dont understand either why inhibitors are an ok thing. they make superweapons reduntant, and if a coronia player can get to tier 3 and get pteranadons+inhibitors, its mostly a game over.

 

im loosing interest in this game over coronia.

Edited by FixenFrøjte, 10 September 2018 - 08:35 PM.

[JackoDerp]

I would say in its current state the only AA that struggles with Pteranodon masses is those that do not do splash.

Mostly Aeroblazes and Oxidisers to an extent.

 

Inhibitors are annoying but they're extremely expensive and power hungry to use. So I'm meh on those, I don't see them particularly often tbh.

[FixenFrøjte]

I would say in its current state the only AA that struggles with Pteranodon masses is those that do not do splash.

Mostly Aeroblazes and Oxidisers to an extent.

 

Inhibitors are annoying but they're extremely expensive and power hungry to use. So I'm meh on those, I don't see them particularly often tbh.

its everything except infantry. but when you DO mass AA infantry, its still a challenge (cathing them too), especially if buzzards, which are almost always mixed with pteranodons. theyre just needlessly OP.

 

-they are way too fast and this nerf isnt enough.

-giving them more damage is a joke.

-their damage against buildings is also too much. i thought they were flying tank destroyers, not flying demolishion experts.

 

im usualy not realy for proposing changes, but those flying fucks realy makes me see their AoE reduced, or completely removed.

 

your inhibitor argument was pretty good, but my mind isnt changed about them still.

Edited by FixenFrøjte, 10 September 2018 - 08:57 PM.

[0Weber0]

 

 

-their damage against buildings is also too much. i thought they were flying tank destroyers, not flying demolishion experts.

 

I do not know what game you're playing, but here Pteranodons are horrible against buildings, especially those that occupy a single cell (say, AA defenses).

[FixenFrøjte]

 

 

 

-their damage against buildings is also too much. i thought they were flying tank destroyers, not flying demolishion experts.

 

I do not know what game you're playing, but here Pteranodons are horrible against buildings, especially those that occupy a single cell (say, AA defenses).

 

yet somehow they keep taking down important structures. they swoop in, and while theyre not exacly SUPER effective, theyre still effective (5-6+ of them), and they fuck off before you can do jackshit about it. single cell defenses are another thing, yes.