Air Units
#361 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 20 September 2005 - 05:12 AM
Example: You change the f-15/f-16 into a raptor
for china you change the J-10/Su-27 to the Pak-Fa
Info on PakFa: http://www.abovetops...hread130829/pg1
http://www.warfare.r...255&linkid=2280
So you could choose if you wanted better bombing for a ong bombing campaign or more air supertiority.
#362
Posted 20 September 2005 - 10:57 AM
#363
Posted 20 September 2005 - 11:58 AM
Powerful, but a new explosive made from silicon is three times more powerful than the leading explosive.
Imagine if they made a fuel air bomb out of that. (FABs are five times more explosive than regular explosives.)
3 X 5 = 15 (I can do math!)
15 times more powerful than the most powerful modern explosive
wow ace can do maths omg
i like the upgrade ideas and whats wrong with the j-10 i love that plane in battlefield 2
#364
Posted 22 September 2005 - 02:18 PM
[quote name='Ace22' date='Sep 20 2005, 12:00 AM']Powerful, but a new explosive made from silicon is three times more powerful than the leading explosive.
Imagine if they made a fuel air bomb out of that. (FABs are five times more explosive than regular explosives.)
3 X 5 = 15 (I can do math!)
15 times more powerful than the most powerful modern explosive
[/quote]
karl are u thinking it dosent matter about power to the military it matters about cost and i think ur lying ive never heard of such yet i work for the nsa.
Edited by THE OVERLORDS, 22 September 2005 - 02:19 PM.
#365
Posted 22 September 2005 - 02:43 PM
NSA as in National Security Agency?
You sure? What do you do? Electronic Intel, or bring guys coffee?
#367
Posted 22 September 2005 - 07:04 PM
Whoa. Hold on a second!
NSA as in National Security Agency?
You sure? What do you do? Electronic Intel, or bring guys coffee?
preety sure he brings guys coffees
#368
Posted 22 September 2005 - 09:45 PM
#369
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:52 PM
#370
Posted 22 September 2005 - 11:54 PM
Anyway, Vanguard knows what I'm talking about in the Crazy ideas thread with the Pentagon thing, so it proves I'm not a nutter, Karl! Hah!
Edited by crave22, 22 September 2005 - 11:55 PM.
#371
Posted 23 September 2005 - 12:12 AM
Crave, please post in the War games thread, as my fleet is far from finished so I will not post for another week at least.
Edited by Ace22, 23 September 2005 - 01:53 AM.
#372
Posted 23 September 2005 - 03:24 AM
#373
Posted 23 September 2005 - 10:55 AM
#374
Posted 23 September 2005 - 11:24 AM
Power doesn't matter, you can have all the power in the world, and you can still be beaten, you need to relax, let imaginge yourself as water and let it flow. You can be peacful one second, and crash down on your enemy with a torrent of force. To believe you are the most powerful is false, there is always someone better then you. Oh and BTW he said he worked for the NSA, so which is it, and if he did he wouldn't have started up that dip shit topic on whether a plane hit the Pentagon..... moron.
can u post in english vangaurd cause i dont understand a word of that
#376
Posted 24 September 2005 - 09:42 AM
#377
Posted 24 September 2005 - 11:25 AM
ACM Air Combat Maneuvering. A series of random jinks and turns that complicates the task of enemy gunners aiming at planes. Would not be applicable to the heavier bombers I keep pushing for, the B-52, B-1B and B-2A. The B-1B may be applicable for the upgrade, on second thought. Nothing short of an F-22 could catch it at low altitude.
Active Camoflauge Like the Predator's cloak from the movies. Probably useful for the F-22 only (I think the Air Force has already tested this, and may explain the price tag of some of the newer planes).
Flares As opposed to countermeasures, these flares would generate much brighter light which would 'clog' up optical tracking systems. An alternative to Active Camo, and useable on any plane.
#378
Posted 24 September 2005 - 06:32 PM
Active Camoflauge Like the Predator's cloak from the movies. Probably useful for the F-22 only (I think the Air Force has already tested this, and may explain the price tag of some of the newer planes).
[
like it
#379
Posted 24 September 2005 - 10:12 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users