880 replies to this topic

[Karlos Vandango]

has any ever had this bug (well i dont know if its a bug)

but when u realse a fae,carpart bomber,lefet bomber

when gets to the hill it gets disabled

by the emp patriots


but on the way it gets hit by them
and dosent???????????????????????

should aircraft be disbaled on cotact or should all aircraft have emp shielding

[Karlos Vandango]

u could have a truck tht realseses a little spy plane with a small camra on the nose
it can go anywere on the map when it gets to its target it circles it for 30 seconds
then self destruct

since it so small it can not be targeted by missles and gattling cannons
it takes 1:30 to reload its mini aircraft
cost 2000 to build in war factoire

u could do a veration with a small missle that does little damage
and it will cost 2500
the plane will circle its target for 20 secs

[link.the.first]

USA:

Hornet:

Four (insert missile type): Very good vs ground and air

Two Sidewiders(upgrade?): Very accurate at close range, AA only

Two Bombs: Ground only, good damage, jet propelled?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Super Hornet:

Six AA/AG missiles: see above

Two Sidewinders

Three Bombs

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Raptor: Stealth

Six Slammers: Long range, great vs aircraft, takes longer to track target at close range, extreme minimum range when attacking ground forces but still very accurate, laser guiding allows it to go through chaff but not PDLs

Two Sidewinders: Short range, AA only, most accurate short-range missile in the game

Machine gun: Good vs aircraft, inaccurate with minimum range vs ground

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FB-22(someone said Condor): Stealth

Two Sidewinders: same as Raptor

Six missiles: OK vs air, great vs ground

Two JDAMs: Big huge f***ing bombs

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-35A JSF(CTOL)

Stealth

Four Sidewinders: same as Raptor

Four (unknown missile type): Great for ground, OK for air

Machine gun: Better than Raptor machine gun

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F-35B JSF(VTOL)

Not Stealth

6-8 AA/AG missiles: same as before

Two Sidewinders

Dual machine guns: min. range is very small

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Switchblade/Bird of Prey:

Stealth

Hi-speed mode: Supersonic, most guns won't even have time to aim at it
4 Seeker cluster bombs: Leave them behind the plane and they will find their own targets(AG only)

Fighter mode: Agile enough to dodge almost anything due to FSWs, not good vs ground
6 Slammers: same as Raptor

Machine gun: same as Raptor, less accurate but smaller min range vs ground forces

Bomber Mode: slow, all AG attacks are very accurate
2 Fuel Air Missiles: Bigger and better than Aurora Alpha

2 JDAMs?

1 Implosion Bomb: Drop one for very slight damage to buildings and usually instant kill if you're lucky enough to actually hit anything else, wait 3 seconds and the building will collapse on itself and anything nearby will be pulled toward it, older aircraft may spin out of control, infantry and vehicles get minor damage, all nearby buildings take decent damage, no building can survive a direct hit

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nanofighter(Ace22's idea):

Stealth

3 forms:
Hypersonic:

Seeker Bombs: Same as Switchblade but they are unlimited and will automatically be dropped as it flies by

Air-air:

Slammers: same as Switchblade

Sidewinders: same as Raptor but slightly more powerful

Machine gun: more powerful than Raptor

Bomber:

Fuel Air Bombs: Same as Switchblade

Implosion Bombs: same as Switchblade, you must RTB to get more

Upgrade to MOAB: makes nuclear silos obsolete because it reloads LOTS faster without much damage reduction, must RTB to get more

********************************************************************
China

MiG 1.42

Stealth

Six missiles, compromise between Slammer and Sidewinder

2 Napalm rockets

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Su-47:

Agile enough to evade a lot of missiles

Eight AA missiles, very inaccurate vs ground at any range

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any other ideas?

[Ace22]

I love the Ideas, but the Nanofighter's Hypersonic weapons probably shouldn't be seeker bombs, however that is a great idea.

The Weapons should be Pulse Missiles, cannot fire against ground, very long range, emit a particle pulse.


We should get Vanguard to implement this in the next version.

[link.the.first]

Pulse missiles sound cool. How about creating a small explosion on impact and releasing a sharp, sudden shockwave half a second later? It could hit ground units directly below it, too, since the shockwave would expand in all directions and not just horizontally.

[Ace22]

It could hit ground units below it, but no delayed shockwave, as the enemy plane could get away, and pulse doesn't work that way.

would look cool on an anti-tank version though. CoughcoughJSFupgradecough.

[Karlos Vandango]

Good list, link.

Is it possible to add a variant of the F-18, the EF-18?  This drastically altered (but superficially quite similar) version of the F-18E Super Hornet is designed to fill the gap from what was the E-6 Prowler, and the SEAD version of the F-16 Viper.  Equipped with powerful radars, larger engines with more fuel and the most formidable ECM/ECCM suite ever fitted to a fighter sized plane, the EF-18 is designed to be the ultimate 'Wild Weasel'.  Armed with AIM-88 HARM (high speed, anti-radiation[radar]) missiles and precision-guided bombs, the EF-18 not only scrambles enemy radar screens and confuses enemy missiles, its weaponry is quite adept at obliterating enemy anti-aircraft missile and artillery units.  Pilots of these aircraft are described as either criminally insane, or stupid, as SEAD pilots are selected on a voluntary basis, and they have a higher attrition rate.....

Another plane would be the B-1B Lancer, having a selectable armament of the long-range JAASM (in game terms, similar to the Tomahawk missile) or cluster bombs, with a much wider dispersion pattern than the F-23 has.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

WERE THE FUCK DO U FIND ALL THIS PANZER!!!!

[Karlos Vandango]

oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooK
il pretend i get it the idea

[Bob]

History student, majoring in WWII.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Cool.

[link.the.first]

I never heard it called the EF-18, but I know a thing or two about the Super Hornet, and it might be the same thing. It looks pretty similar, but the whole plane is bigger, the intakes are square instead of round, and it carries more weapons. Also, the wings flex five degrees, so it is a lot more maneuverable. I don't know anything about the electronics.

Which one was the B1B? Was that the big bomber with the swing wings?

[Karlos Vandango]

Which one was the B1B?  Was that the big bomber with the swing wings?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

pretty sure it was

[Ace22]

the Super Hornet and the Jammer hornet, are not the same.

[link.the.first]

So the EF-18 was the jammer hornet and it is designed to scramble radars, disrupt communications, render seeker missiles useless, etc? That would be a good plane. Is everything but the electronics and fuel capacity the same? If the weapons and agility are the same, it should be the upgrade of the regular Hornet and the Super Hornet is a different plane entirely.

Or, you build a Hornet and can upgrade it once to either the EF-18 or the Super Hornet. To balance, the EF-18 has a few less missiles, and teh Super Hornet is a completely better fighter.

Edited by link.the.first, 24 August 2005 - 11:06 PM.

[Ace22]

no, different weapons.

[7th_Panzer]

Finally got around to re-registering.

The B-1B, along with the venerable but aging B-52, comprises the USAF's current heavy bomber force. The B-2A, though stealth, has a more limited weapons capacity and is *very* expensive, about $2 billion a piece. The B-2A also is a very important part of the US's nuclear triad, and likely the second most survivable (the Navy's ballistic missile submarines are the most survivable, and the most stealthy machines ever created).

At very low altitutes, the B-1B, it is said, can not be caught by any fighter in existance. This, with its stealthy radar cross section and powerful ECM suite, give it vastly improved penetration capabilities as opposed to the B-52.

The B-1B can deliver both nuclear and conventional weapons, though today mostly the latter. A single B-1B can carry 125,000lbs of ordinance, and is the only bomber in the world that can carry a mixture of weapons.

Compare the bombload to a B-17 of the Second World War. A B-1B can carry the equivalent munitions of 16 B-17s, at three to four times the speed and three times the range.

The B-52 can carry half the bombload of the B-1B. Half.

[Ace22]

Yes, we implement the B1-B. How do we get it off the ground?

Since you are a military genius, what is the difference between the Army and the Marine Corps?