Hey guy please register at these forums and make posts without change of the nick
what's the point of being able to survive a conventional attack? are you just going to defend all the time?
even those terrorists / guerilla warfare could do that

, they're maybe even better,,
those huge amount of military power are just a bunch of meatshield if they can't attack. You see, china and russia is in the asian continent, they have to use naval to transport their army(land) in order to attack the US. You can't attack well without having a land to start on can you??
China doesn't have an aircraft carrier, neither do Russia.. well russia do have, but c'monn!! admiral kuznetzhov??? it's old, and reaching it's date of retirement. Even if they do use their (russia & china) carriers, it might not even be able to reach USA, since the US has
18 of them guarding both atlantic and the pacific ocean. It's even harder because each of the US carriers are accompanied by
at least 2 destroyers, 2 cruisers, 2 subs, and 1 supply ship (doesn't count).
Or they might even just tomahawk you from the US border
game over.
the european union military might be a better match though.
eurofighters, rafales, tornados, grippens, type 45, french destroyers, astute subs, leopard 2 (strongest tank), challenger 2, leclerc, apache, eurocopters, and
much more...
that's just about enough to outmatch russia / china.
quantity doesn't decide the outcome of a war, quality does. BUT, quantity
do have an effect on a war if they are
well equipped.
AND another factor is
experience and luck, that's about it.