MO 3.3 // Feedback & Suggestions (Balance, New Features, Modifications etc.)
#1921
Posted 01 September 2017 - 08:03 PM
#1922
Posted 01 September 2017 - 09:45 PM
pretty sure the rad was removed to make it less effective against infantry and units making it easier to intercept by light forces
#1923
Posted 02 September 2017 - 04:54 AM
I like gnomes
Visit us in Totem Arts site
(Firestorm is still SoonTM)
#1924
Posted 02 September 2017 - 10:07 PM
weve probably already talked about this, but i feel like the russian infantry roster is kinda uninteresting in comparison to confederation and china, who have something special. like confederation has arsonists and mortar quads, and china has eradicators and gyrocoptors. does russia not deserve something special? i think the word "russian commisar" popped up in this thread at some point, which i thought sounded fun. its not just the purpose of filling more stuff in, because its cool, but genuinely because i feel like Russia's infantry is the weakest of the soviets (heroes not accounted for).
Edited by FixenFrøjte, 02 September 2017 - 10:09 PM.
#1925
Posted 02 September 2017 - 11:50 PM
we've probably already talked about this, but i feel like the Russian infantry roster is kinda uninteresting in comparison to confederation and china
Russia have Overcharge, which increases damage of ALL tesla tech (including Tesla Troopers), so they also have kind of "unique infantry option"
#1926
Posted 03 September 2017 - 12:17 AM
Given their focus on tesla tech, maybe Russia could have an upgraded version of the Tesla Trooper, like how China has an upgraded Desolator?
Perhaps the Tesla Trooper could keep any building online via force attacking it, if there's enough of them, e.g. provide 75 power each, so a factory would require 2 to keep online.
Sort of a back up if you lose your conyard and are low power you could use them to maintain the 100% production rate or if you loathe how frequently the AI sends spies you could use them to override the power down. Could be low tier to allow a cost inefficient way to fast tech by keeping the conyard powered, or just push it to high tier to prevent that.
If that idea doesn't work, an alternative idea is to allow the trooper to deploy and create a stunfield. Not like the Foehn stungrids, but short pulses kinda like Volkov's EMP effect, a sort of Russian take on the Desolator.
#1927
Posted 03 September 2017 - 12:18 AM
I'm wondering if air-to-air fighters could be implemented.
This would add more diversity to air units, but also provide balance. A jet is an extremely mobile anti-air unit, so it nerfs Pteranodons, jet spam, and Kirov/Quetzal/Basilisk/Barracuda without directly tweaking their numbers. Building anti-air jets wouldn't weaken your ground army either. A few subfactions have anti-air-only units anyway like Aeroblaze, Sentinel, Gehenna, and Oxidizers. A jet, however, is better at certain situations where speedy anti-air is needed.
- pikachu11 likes this
#1928
Posted 03 September 2017 - 12:48 AM
Russia has Chitzkoi, that's their "special infantry". Always was.weve probably already talked about this, but i feel like the russian infantry roster is kinda uninteresting in comparison to confederation and china, who have something special. like confederation has arsonists and mortar quads, and china has eradicators and gyrocoptors. does russia not deserve something special? i think the word "russian commisar" popped up in this thread at some point, which i thought sounded fun. its not just the purpose of filling more stuff in, because its cool, but genuinely because i feel like Russia's infantry is the weakest of the soviets (heroes not accounted for).
Edited by mevitar, 03 September 2017 - 01:21 AM.
(◉ ᗝ ◉)
#1929
Posted 03 September 2017 - 04:27 AM
This could be a buffer against some stuff including but not limited to, Jets, Baracudas, Black Widows, Kirovs, Capital Ship Projectiles, Unkillable Coronia air fleet, Dyyubk bombers, and etc. a lot of anti air options simply aren't having the disired effect against units like these like flak cannons, shrikes, and even T1 anti air vehicles like flaks and ifvs. If we can buff some of the firepower under tier three, we can safely force players to be more careful in their air approach while giving defending players some much needed security after spamming 5-10 anti air defenses.
Also, if we do this can the Warhawk get an armor buff? It's pretty fragile as it is already and having it die to the newly buffed anti air in two shots isn't going to help it. Oh and invaders too k thx
Edited by NorthFireZ, 03 September 2017 - 04:28 AM.
I have a year-long Writer's block @ https://www.fanficti...1/At-Mind-s-End But youtube is doing well! https://www.youtube....ser/andywong545
#1930
Posted 03 September 2017 - 07:16 AM
hey just wondering whats the best way to post pictures to these forums cause i have a ton of pretty base maps i would love to show off in the screenshot thread
Edited by legionnaire501, 03 September 2017 - 07:29 AM.
#1931
Posted 03 September 2017 - 08:20 AM
Possible unit for allieds is a tank that is similar to the chronosphere. Put up to 8 units around it and deploy it, then select somewhere on the battlefield.
Is this a good idea? Or is it just another thing to unbalance the game? (Plz dont hate)
#1932
Posted 03 September 2017 - 09:30 AM
I'm wondering if air-to-air fighters could be implemented.
It's possible but Speeder does not want to. It's not really reliable to be hoenst.
- TheWankBank likes this
#1933
Posted 03 September 2017 - 09:51 AM
I was thinking that each faction could get a special stolen tech unit, but the requirement is to own/have the ability to build all the stolen tech units for that faction (e.g allieds have quickshifter, Lionheart, chronoprison, future tank alpha). All the special stolen tech units are epic units.
Possible unit for allieds is a tank that is similar to the chronosphere. Put up to 8 units around it and deploy it, then select somewhere on the battlefield.
Is this a good idea? Or is it just another thing to unbalance the game? (Plz dont hate)
i do miss the bonus stolen tech from 2.0 mainly because i didnt know they were there for the most part
the 2 i remember were the decimater which really lived up to its name and the Apollo droid which was like a moving, floating psychic tower
and there are still many if not most of the stolen tech infantry that are still unused and could make a come back particularly in the infantry wars mode or in regular if you say infiltrate the barracks and eco booster on top of the tech center and con yard
- UNSC THE CHILL OF WAR likes this
#1935
Posted 03 September 2017 - 11:39 AM
Psychic tower gets attacked by 2 Barracuda, and it has 2 health left. come on.
#1936
Posted 03 September 2017 - 05:05 PM
Will it be okay if Soviet get their own anti-spy unit..? I didn't mean like dogs and terror drones. I mean like robot tank and clairvoyant which doesn't need to move and have ranged weapon to take care spies.
I tried using ctrl alt to force defend but they still wander off and never came back to their spot.
I admit the reasoning behind it is weak: only because I like putting them symmetrically and prefer them to stay on their spot.
#1937
Posted 03 September 2017 - 05:40 PM
You do realise that the Sensor Tower is pretty loud, right?
Don't mind me, I'm just pretty broke nowadays...
#1938
Posted 03 September 2017 - 05:45 PM
You do realise that the Sensor Tower is pretty loud, right?
Still neither kill nor incapacitate the spies.
#1939
Posted 03 September 2017 - 05:59 PM
Look, it literally marks the spies for you, and even makes a ton of noise in the meanwhile, so... It's kinda your fault if you don't do anything by then (and also an armor debuff to make the job of killing said spies much easier)
Don't mind me, I'm just pretty broke nowadays...
#1940
Posted 03 September 2017 - 06:36 PM
Will it be okay if Soviet get their own anti-spy unit..? I didn't mean like dogs and terror drones. I mean like robot tank and clairvoyant which doesn't need to move and have ranged weapon to take care spies.
I tried using ctrl alt to force defend but they still wander off and never came back to their spot.
I admit the reasoning behind it is weak: only because I like putting them symmetrically and prefer them to stay on their spot.
A patrol loop in waypoint mode never fail
Edited by PACER, 03 September 2017 - 06:36 PM.
- Bernadiroe likes this
In-game speed vs real life speed? →
Malver in Obisidian Sands? →
Strength-Agility-Intellect subfactions? →
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users