376 replies to this topic

[TeslaCruiser]

yeah, you can be frustrated but MO is a non-profit project developed by people in their spare time... you better embrace the :soon: <<insert KA-52 image>>

[CLAlstar]

Got your back buddy.

[isaac103]

Got your back buddy.

Damn those Wolfhounds......

[JustJoking]

I can't wait to play all missions on Mental. I'll try not to look at any walktroughs, not even for Singularity, considering it's the only mission I haven't completed yet.

[StolenTech]

can the catastrophe buff be revert please ? it's really not needed.

[isaac103]

So I saw that the changelog has now been updated to be released on a 3rd day of the month.....possibly April 3rd if I'm reading this correctly? 

[StolenTech]

That's.... the month date... not day

[isaac103]

Ah, blast....I've always been used to the mm/dd/yyyy format.....this some sort of international date style? That's my take on the whole situation at the moment.

[TeslaCruiser]

different conventions, depends on the country

 

[Divine]

Sometimes I feel like one day I woke up in an alternative reality where everyone forgot the utility of writing months as roman numerals, and thus avoiding any sort of confusion stemming from date format conventions.

Edited by Divine, 05 March 2018 - 03:19 PM.

[PACER]

Sometimes I feel like one day I woke up in an alternative reality where everyone forgot the utility of writing months as roman numerals, and thus avoiding any sort of confusion stemming from date format conventions.

 

[SPQR triggered]

[isaac103]

So I presume most of the people roaming these forums are from Europe and China?

[CrimsonRaider]

I don't understand, why the d/m/y is the most commonly used system in the world..... It confuses me too sometimes. It would be more logical to use the Y/M/D format, instead of that. Because nobody says the time like 'it's 34:12' or something like that, then why do people keep using d/m/y format?  (no offense ofc, just curiosity)

Edited by CrimsonRaider, 05 March 2018 - 04:00 PM.

[XoGamer]

can the catastrophe buff be revert please ? it's really not needed.

 

ha

no

 

confeds need buff one way or another

[NorthFireZ]

Cause the year doesn’t change as much. Really, that’s it. In everyday use why would you put the year first, it’s very repetitive. Almost like Carver reminding everyone that he has self made mod every time he posts.

[NorthFireZ]

can the catastrophe buff be revert please ? it's really not needed.

 
ha
no
 
confeds need buff one way or another

Did you miss all the other Confed buffs or are the rest of us just seeing hallucinations.

[Endless]

 

can the catastrophe buff be revert please ? it's really not needed.

 

ha

no

 

confeds need buff one way or another

 

The catastrophe buff was a response to the Ptneranodon utterly wrecking the absolute [Christian server friendly zone] out of Catas.
With the current nerf to Petras, I do not see any reason to keep the catastrophe buff in place as is.

Also, I don't see how LC needs to be buffed other than the issue mentioned above, which will (hopefully) be rectified in the future.

[XoGamer]

+ buff: Catastrophe strength increased from 550 to 610

The buff is to health, and the change is justified as Catastrophes die easily to be fair, however maybe to make it fair, the damage should be decreased

edit: and the other buffs are to Vulture and Fury Drone because they were underused

Edited by XoGamer, 05 March 2018 - 06:00 PM.

[Endless]

+ buff: Catastrophe strength increased from 550 to 610

The buff is to health, and the change is justified as Catastrophes die easily to be fair, however maybe to make it fair, the damage should be decreased

 

What have you been smoking o.o

But seriously though, Catas dying easily? I cant say I agree with that, especially when you consider support powers and the fact you can garrison an all purpose infantry unit that will pretty destroying everything that isnt a robot while inside said Cata.

But I digress, haven't played 3.3.2 in a while so god knows what's been going on

[XoGamer]

 

+ buff: Catastrophe strength increased from 550 to 610

The buff is to health, and the change is justified as Catastrophes die easily to be fair, however maybe to make it fair, the damage should be decreased

 

What have you been smoking o.o

But seriously though, Catas dying easily? I cant say I agree with that, especially when you consider support powers and the fact you can garrison an all purpose infantry unit that will pretty destroying everything that isnt a robot while inside said Cata.

But I digress, haven't played 3.3.2 in a while so god knows what's been going on

 

 

Three or Four Lancers can easily kill a Cata