And can be something like this http://forums.revora...p...t=0&start=0 created for Remix?
As I understand Remix and Contra are very close to each other.
Edited by NoFace, 18 March 2008 - 04:42 PM.
Posted 18 March 2008 - 04:41 PM
Edited by NoFace, 18 March 2008 - 04:42 PM.
Posted 18 March 2008 - 05:46 PM
Edited by Capt.Drake, 18 March 2008 - 05:47 PM.
Posted 19 March 2008 - 12:35 AM
Its not about looking cool its about them doing there job.
Weapons are not designed to be cool there designed to kill, looks would be the last thing you worry about.
I would rather a butt ugly mech that can kill hardcore and is reliable and strong over a mech that looks cool but just don't have the staying power as the ugly one, you catch my meaning?
AK47s are not the most attractive assault rifle made but they can be fired after so much punishment, I watched a video of the top 10 rated rifles of all time, Rated on innovation, combat effectiveness, handling, service length and accuracy.
The AK47 was number 1 and one of the experts said "what can you do to an ak47 to make it stop firing? not a whole lot maybe drive over it with a tank." Another said "the ak you can bury it in sand you can bury it in mud you can abuse it to the degree where its covered in rust and it will still work, that weapons is going to keep you alive"
So my point stands if u had to choose a gun what would you choose out of the AK47 and the Famas for example (since u like cool looking weapons) I know what i would choose, i choose the more reliable and rifle with years of service to prove how awesome it is. AK47 all the way man lol
I still would love an M16 or XM8 tho lol
O i found the video on You Tube AK47
Posted 19 March 2008 - 01:49 AM
Posted 20 March 2008 - 01:29 PM
Edited by morsematten, 20 March 2008 - 01:39 PM.
Posted 20 March 2008 - 02:11 PM
Posted 20 March 2008 - 02:12 PM
Posted 20 March 2008 - 09:44 PM
Protect your airfield better and you won't have to worry about losing it.
Posted 21 March 2008 - 03:36 AM
Posted 21 March 2008 - 07:02 AM
Posted 21 March 2008 - 07:51 AM
Edited by Alias, 21 March 2008 - 07:51 AM.
Posted 21 March 2008 - 01:12 PM
The planes will stay alive without an airfield as long as they have ammo left (and are, of course, in the air).
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:36 AM
Edited by Phoenix911, 23 March 2008 - 02:14 AM.
Posted 22 March 2008 - 12:25 PM
but they die to easyAF gen has arouras that are fast enough to hit there target anyways so that makes up for him
Posted 22 March 2008 - 02:03 PM
Posted 22 March 2008 - 03:40 PM
and advance airfield can hold up to 8, so it'll be 8*1200 = 9600 dollars. if they just finished attacking, and some idiot destoryed your airfield, you lose 9600 dollars for no reason. and the worst thing is you have to rebuilt it, which will cost another 9600 dollars.
another thing, since you know how to defend your airfields with AA, if that is the solution you are suggesting, what makes you think opponent dont guard their SW with AA? so SW can still destory your airfield before you destory his/her SW.
and to safe space is easy! just move the centre up and put the airfield below... highrise. so i dont see how it can waste space, unless what you were thinkin is an airfield attachted to the centre at ground level.
Posted 22 March 2008 - 04:04 PM
Posted 23 March 2008 - 02:26 AM
Posted 23 March 2008 - 08:36 AM
It's not an engine problem, it is game design.Firstly aircrafts dieing after there ammo is depleted with no where to land is an engine problem not pend wanting it to be like that.
Posted 23 March 2008 - 10:29 AM
Between now and the next polished release there should be very little new art work done. Instead the focus is on designing, testing, and fixing. the mod has always been so close to finished that its nearly criminal. I'd love to see this through to the end with a real community effort.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users