WW2 discussion
#101
Posted 25 September 2006 - 09:21 PM
nike factory is the parts under Russia(more than 1 country
#102
Posted 25 September 2006 - 09:53 PM
WtF???? They had a party in the US... but it was not popular, and they were never treated as heros. Who the hell are you listening to to believe this stuff???nothing you talk about matters.
the only thing that matters is that nazies were treaterd as heros in america
Between now and the next polished release there should be very little new art work done. Instead the focus is on designing, testing, and fixing. the mod has always been so close to finished that its nearly criminal. I'd love to see this through to the end with a real community effort.
#103
Posted 25 September 2006 - 10:04 PM
do they still have a party like that?
#104
Posted 25 September 2006 - 10:59 PM
what they had a party in the US?
do they still have a party like that?
No. they were never "popular" but at first they were atleast note worthy because america was suffering in the great depression and they showed how effective the econic reforms were in Germany. The actualy onset of WW2 was a pretty lethal blow to the public's opinion.
Skin heads (Neo Nazis) and KKK still exsist, but they are a very small minority who don't refelct the opinions of the people they claim to represent. They're not even a 1% of 1% of the population. They're just people so wrapped up in hate they can't think for themselves.
Between now and the next polished release there should be very little new art work done. Instead the focus is on designing, testing, and fixing. the mod has always been so close to finished that its nearly criminal. I'd love to see this through to the end with a real community effort.
#105
Posted 26 September 2006 - 01:22 AM
I gotta say Spetz... Despite all the america hating you've done in the past. I've still respected you but now...nothing you talk about matters.
the only thing that matters is that nazies were treaterd as heros in america
That's just to dumb. You should read a book or worse. ACTUALLY COME HERE BEFORE YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT HOW SHITTY IT IS! GODDAMNIT! Your really pissing me off. I mean... It's like you've let your goverment use your head as a fucking propaganda storage machine. Realize. EVERYONES GOVERMENT LIES (most of the time) TO THEM. Do a little research next time....
Sorry about going off the handle everyone.
The hand has five fingers. Capable and strong. Able to both create and destroy
#106
Posted 26 September 2006 - 01:53 AM
A wise man chooses death before war, A wiser man chooses not to become war.
Foamy!?!! Xombie!?! Awesome Cannon Rock
Everyone should watch this and pass it on as its a very good argument on the subject of Global Warming.
#107
Posted 26 September 2006 - 08:49 AM
No, they were using IS-2but the Russians used the IS3 in the war 2 right?
i think there was a pic with a IS3 in berlin
IS-2 was used late war, and looks almost identical.
This is IS-2
And this is the photo which confused you. IS-3 in Berlin. The 7th of September 1945. Military parade 4 months after the war.
Edited by Creator, 26 September 2006 - 08:50 AM.
#108
Posted 26 September 2006 - 12:17 PM
IS2 doesnt look good?(was it hit?)
the IS3 looks awsome
i love how the tank looks pointy in the frint
#109
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:09 PM
that shows what a prat G.W bush is, and it has some really good facts..
but michael moore is anti bush- so most of it is biased and is properganda.
and what tanks were the british using ? or were they using the USA shedarins (sp)
CnC Guild - As ancient as time itself.
Do you like anything CnC releated? Then the CnC guild likes you! Go make friends with it.
Latest Remix Escalation on ModDB
Remix Escalation on Revora - Track the latest news and changes.
#110
Posted 26 September 2006 - 06:23 PM
No. First IS-3 tank exited factory doors in 3 months after the end of the war. It could not be used in battles because the war was over.so the Russians didnt use the IS3? i thought thet used them in the end of the war
No. Just dirty.IS2 doesnt look good?(was it hit?)
#111
Posted 26 September 2006 - 08:23 PM
i saw itwhow,, loads of your are from america? has any body seen farenhieht(sp) 9/11?
that shows what a prat G.W bush is, and it has some really good facts..
but michael moore is anti bush- so most of it is biased and is properganda.
and what tanks were the british using ? or were they using the USA shedarins (sp)
Bush told michael moore 2 get a real job
what do u mean what tanks were the British using?(in WW2)
in WW2 they had
Churchill
comet
cronwell
firefly(another version of the Sherman)
crusder
valetin
grant
i think they also used the basic sherman
#112
Posted 27 September 2006 - 12:22 PM
#113
Posted 27 September 2006 - 08:36 PM
#114 Guest_Guest_Bigfatkirov_*_*
Posted 01 October 2006 - 03:25 AM
the best russian tank in the WW2 was the kv-1, the t-34 was fine, but i would love that the kv-1 would have win the war
but the panther was the king , no doubt
about the planes all the sides had their "stars"
the americans of course with the p-51 and p-47
the germans the me-109, that was better in "turning" combat , but the f-190 was faster and better climb
perhaps the soviets had the most maneouverable fighters, the yak-3, and the la-7 but with very poor protection and poor trained crews
but the king was the spitfire
#116
Posted 01 October 2006 - 08:18 AM
Then there havn't only been Spits Mustangs and Bf-109, you forget a hole bunch of Planes like the Fw-190
And about tanks, the Phanter was undermotorized and was sent into service without fieldtesting, it would have been better with good testing before, but still they owned the T-34 on ranges of about 2km with teir 8.8cm cannons
#117
Posted 01 October 2006 - 10:04 AM
ace pilots always win agents rookies, and that the same for all things an ace tank crew agents another and the ace wins. or an ace platoon vs the rookie platoon ace comes out on top.Put A rookie in a Spitfire vs. an ace in a mustang.
Guess who comes out on top.
As i've said (and yelled) in the past It's not all about the vehicle.
But that was a bad comparason , the mustang is very similer to the spitfire, the main difference is it has a bigger turning cicle and it has more fuel as it was ment as a logn range intercepter.
A wise man chooses death before war, A wiser man chooses not to become war.
Foamy!?!! Xombie!?! Awesome Cannon Rock
Everyone should watch this and pass it on as its a very good argument on the subject of Global Warming.
#118 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 01 October 2006 - 11:40 AM
WtF???? They had a party in the US... but it was not popular, and they were never treated as heros. Who the hell are you listening to to believe this stuff???nothing you talk about matters.
the only thing that matters is that nazies were treaterd as heros in america
discovery channel and some old nasa people
(exspetz)
#119 Guest_Guest_Bigfatkirov_*_*
Posted 01 October 2006 - 12:37 PM
in the european theatre the p-40 wouldnt have survived against the bf109
but yes it depends on the pilot, of course
#120
Posted 01 October 2006 - 02:31 PM
what?what about tanks and planes and hardware ingeneral??
the best russian tank in the WW2 was the kv-1, the t-34 was fine, but i would love that the kv-1 would have win the war
but the panther was the king , no doubt
about the planes all the sides had their "stars"
the americans of course with the p-51 and p-47
the germans the me-109, that was better in "turning" combat , but the f-190 was faster and better climb
perhaps the soviets had the most maneouverable fighters, the yak-3, and the la-7 but with very poor protection and poor trained crews
but the king was the spitfire
KV1s arent as good as the IS tanks right?
i love the IS3
and what about the german jet engine planes?
me262,me163,natter ,and much more
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users