77 replies to this topic

[True Lord of Chaos]

- More Faster

Ahh... that really needs to be changed to Faster.

[wcvechten]

that guy still isnt gone?...
heck
that pokemonsigmadude makes me go insaneeee

[Beowulf]

Need a Battle Fortress for the Allied Generals plsss.....

Yeah, because giant rolling death REALLY fits the Allied side.

[Misthero]

i think with the advanced infantry, battle fortress might become broke with them. :|

[need my speed]

genobreaker is right though, it doesn't fit the Allies if you think about it. But then again, why have Soviets Flak Track's? Weak, fast cannon fodder...Still I think the Allies need a transport, and not an AA vehicle with the added bonus of transporting 1 infantry. That also modifies its weapon which sometimes is bad (you need to transport an Engineer but a Harrier comes flying past, hadn't the Engineer changed its weapon system the Harrier would be destroyed, but now). Maybe make an additional vehicle, APC, Humvee, whatever.

[Beowulf]

Nighthawk. Problem solved.

[need my speed]

Oh lol, I thoguht you where talking shit. But after 10 seconds of looking at your (double) post, I get what you're saying.

Well, Nighthawk, I hate that thing. It is very weak and has a crappy gun. And, you can hear it even while it is off screen, alerting you to its presence (you hear its propellors). But I hate transport only choppers anyway. They're always way to expensive (why would I pay $1000 for a flying thing that's worse the na Humvee of $600 or something in my opinion), thus they also take too long to build. And I just hate them, but I don't really know why.

[Misthero]

Nighthawks, Airforce General, has Fireports. :o.... (Have fun sniping away)

[need my speed]

Airforce's Nighthawks would be good then. Normal Nighthawk's, I hate them...

[Misthero]

you want a Nighthawk that has armed Missiles? (like a commandchee persay... but less powerful and has a small passenger list)
or a nighthawk that's 'anti-infantry' using Commandchee's Vulcan Guns?
i'm saying, maybe an upgrade on the entire Nighthawk or... General Specific Upgrades

Edited by Misthero, 18 March 2009 - 10:27 AM.

[Beowulf]

The Nighthawk is an infantry transport. Wam. The Allies were meant for air superiority anyway and the Soviets for ground. Hence why they have the Flak Track.

[wcvechten]

flack track is just there to fill in the IFV's role for soviets and due its capacity aswell as the nighthawk I suppose

[wcvechten]

you dont count pokemon sigma P:

[genobreaker]

well PokemonSIGMA... this version of YRZH... the Battle Fortress may or may not be in a general... Like Laser General, will not have battle fortress...
btw... the battle Fortress are available to Vanilla Allied, Superweapon General, Air Force General if you noticed...

i have plans for those different kinds of BF in the next one... like Heat Gun for Superweapons, Laser Gun for Laser, etc...

Edited by genobreaker, 19 March 2009 - 11:10 AM.

[TapSiLogMACHINE]

Well, Nighthawk, I hate that thing. It is very weak and has a crappy gun. And, you can hear it even while it is off screen, alerting you to its presence (you hear its propellors). But I hate transport only choppers anyway. They're always way to expensive (why would I pay $1000 for a flying thing that's worse the na Humvee of $600 or something in my opinion), thus they also take too long to build. And I just hate them, but I don't really know why.

hey geno, can you somehow silence the rotors of the nighthawk. this guy has a point. and besides, a hawk doesn't make any noise at all when in flight.

you want a Nighthawk that has armed Missiles? (like a commandchee persay... but less powerful and has a small passenger list)
or a nighthawk that's 'anti-infantry' using Commandchee's Vulcan Guns?
i'm saying, maybe an upgrade on the entire Nighthawk or... General Specific Upgrades

comanche? you mean like the soviet's twinblade from RA3? missiles and vulcan guns, and can transport up to 5 infantry units, or 1 vehicle...

Edited by TapSiLogMACHINE, 19 March 2009 - 12:43 PM.

[need my speed]

That thing was actually great...But that's because it was an attack chopper with a secondary role of transport. The Nighthawk needs to be faster, sneakier...heck, maybe make it invisible (since it is a vehicle, it's possible, for aircraft also though, just make it start veteran and give it stealth when it reaches veteran). But that would maybe make it overpowered.

[TapSiLogMACHINE]

That thing was actually great...But that's because it was an attack chopper with a secondary role of transport. The Nighthawk needs to be faster, sneakier...heck, maybe make it invisible (since it is a vehicle, it's possible, for aircraft also though, just make it start veteran and give it stealth when it reaches veteran). But that would maybe make it overpowered.

your idea=
but lose the stealth... we need to make those rotors (almost) silent, and yes, make the chopper go a little faster..

[wcvechten]

I agree with the faster and a more silenced version of the hawk
yet if you want to add stealth
to make it logical, you need to adjust its shape, just like those f-117 (if I remember well)