Jump to content


Photo

Suggestions


  • Please log in to reply
3930 replies to this topic

#2221 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:09 PM

I got this idea about the possible new side. The Kalifian Unification Army (KUA) and also figured out a some type of a plot for it. :rolleyes:
An African army fighting to unite Africa, return its resources back to the African people and purify the African race. The KUA believes that Africans are, as parents of humanity, the most superior race of humans.
Their radical policy, operating methods and killing anyone who opposes them have made them scum to the western people (via the global media) and to the UN. However the USA, even when pressured to do something, did hardly anything since they didn't have enough to gain from participating in this conflict.
But the way KUA banishes and mass murders the global corporations local commands and takees control over all industries and farms also attracted the GLAs attention. The KUAs policy had turned the money valves in norther Africa from GLA to KUA and the KUA also threatened their defense by compromising their primary industries security. This was considered unacceptable and soon GLA began fighting the KUA as well.
Shortly after GLA began to openly fight in Africa the USA chose to began a war against the KUA now that the stakes had become much higher.
Little did anyone know that the Chinese government had been supporting the KUA for quite a while now in exchange of destroying the GLA production in Saudi-Arabia. They considered them to be a powerful ally against the GLA.
USAs and GLAs warefforts in Africa had very little success, since the vast majority of the Africans supported the KUAs cause, and the KUA continued to expand across Africa. When KUA had "unified" Central Africa and parts from Norther- and Southern Africa, they decided to bring out the fact that China had been supporting them for the whole time and also began to cooperate with GLA. This of course outraged USA whose ally China had been and China was outraged by the fact that KUA had chosen to ally with Chinas worst enemy. KUA and GLA though weren't the best allies and they both began to prepare for a double cross.
(I thought that this kind of a plot would make fighting between USA and China more reasonable and since GLA and KUA both were preparing to double cross each other it wouldn't be much of a suprice that they would start to fight against eachother again soon.)

The KUAs symbol could be a black sharp corner up triangle that would be crossed by two golden scimitars in the center and there would also be golden K in the base of the triangle. Something like this: (yea,yea the picture sucks but it gives quidelines, eh?)
<----->
\ K /
s \ / s
-scimitars-
\/
The KUAs buildings would have a similar style to the GLAs buildings but they would use some electricity (KUAs powerplant wouldn't provide much power), they would use trucks to gather supplies and they would use hackers and special supplystations to alternatively gain money. The special supplystations would act like normal supplystations, but they would be replenished via cargoplane (countdowntime 4 min. or something) and have a buildlimit of 5 or something (the cargoplane would bring 10000 at a time but the docks could only hold 40000 so the exessive supplies would be destroyed. The supplies could only be harvested from the station by supplyharvesters and would have to be brought to a supply collection dock (supplycenter or moblile stash).
Their superweapon would be an artillery battery would fire a powerful artillery strike over a very large area that would cause as much damage as a third level artillery battery and its countdowntime would be 4 minutes.
Their units would be African and the KUA would utilize both Chinese and GLA technology in their arsenal. They would also have some highly advanced units.
I haven't thought about the other units or -buildings yet... ;)

#2222 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 March 2008 - 12:11 PM

Darn, the "picture" didn't work... :rolleyes:

#2223 Guest_Guest_*

Guest_Guest_*
  • Guests

Posted 06 March 2008 - 07:45 AM

i think russia should be added as a new side. if not, india. if not, EU. if not, ASEAN.

#2224 for russia!

for russia!
  • Members
  • 123 posts
  • Location:Woodlands, singapore, asia, earth
  • Projects:nil
  •  AKA AZZKIKR

Posted 06 March 2008 - 08:58 AM

ASEAN. as singapore-owned company a country under asean is said to be the largest producer of 40mm rocket-propelled grenades. and we have our own local vehicles like Bionix
well, i'm from singapore and now 15 years old. why do u require such information? i will tell you nothing else!

#2225 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 March 2008 - 06:25 AM

Shouldn't the strategic aviation aslo be made crashable when destroyed? They would act like the demo generals plane crash power. Crash into the ground, explode and start a flamestorm.

And also, if the new side gets as many generals as the other sides, couldn't the new sides fourth general be a some kind of a creeper general who builds new defence lines closer to his enemy? The defence lines would contain much long range defences, so they would clear a new place for the new defence line. This tactic would be rather dearing (if the enemy has strong units standing by or long range defences to destroy the unfinished defence line near their base), but it wouldn't only surround the enemy in their only base, it would also slowly bombard them to death because attempting to destroy the defence lines of the creeper general would be hard because of strong AA, AT and AI defences.

#2226 Guest_Contra_*

Guest_Contra_*
  • Guests

Posted 10 March 2008 - 09:43 PM

Hey creator will there be more colors to these new sides instead of the old red and gold ones? What about black or white? :sad:

#2227 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 11 March 2008 - 07:34 AM

And also, if the new side gets as many generals as the other sides, couldn't the new sides fourth general be a some kind of a creeper general who builds new defence lines closer to his enemy? The defence lines would contain much long range defences, so they would clear a new place for the new defence line. This tactic would be rather dearing (if the enemy has strong units standing by or long range defences to destroy the unfinished defence line near their base), but it wouldn't only surround the enemy in their only base, it would also slowly bombard them to death because attempting to destroy the defence lines of the creeper general would be hard because of strong AA, AT and AI defences.

All GLA generals as well as Super Weapon general can use this strategy.

Hey creator will there be more colors to these new sides instead of the old red and gold ones? What about black or white? :sad:

White is for civilians and neutrals. Black is not visible on minimap. I tried it.

#2228 morsematten

morsematten
  • Members
  • 238 posts
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 11 March 2008 - 12:52 PM

is this possible? if anyones destorys civilian units/vehicle or buildings, money will be deducted from them.
I'm the nut cracker, and i'll crack your nuts.

#2229 PeeWee

PeeWee

    Title unavailable

  • Members
  • 351 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  •  Why so serious error?

Posted 11 March 2008 - 04:37 PM

is this possible? if anyones destorys civilian units/vehicle or buildings, money will be deducted from them.


What! ur talking crazy!
CPU: Phenom II X6 T1090 @ 3,85GHz
Memory: 8Gb DDR3 1600MHz
Graphics: XFX HD5870 XT
Mobo: ASUS Crosshair Formula IV
Monitor: Asus 22" 2ms @ 1680x1050
Case: Lian Li V2000 Fulltower
PSU: Corsair VX550W

#2230 morsematten

morsematten
  • Members
  • 238 posts
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 12 March 2008 - 03:29 AM

i mean if you think about it it makes sense right? you kill innocent people, you pay.
I'm the nut cracker, and i'll crack your nuts.

#2231 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 12 March 2008 - 07:10 AM

is this possible? if anyones destorys civilian units/vehicle or buildings, money will be deducted from them.

It is possible for GLA to gain money when killing civilians. But it is not possible to substract money.

Edited by Creator, 12 March 2008 - 07:13 AM.


#2232 PeeWee

PeeWee

    Title unavailable

  • Members
  • 351 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  •  Why so serious error?

Posted 16 March 2008 - 09:41 AM

is this possible? if anyones destorys civilian units/vehicle or buildings, money will be deducted from them.

It is possible for GLA to gain money when killing civilians. But it is not possible to substract money.


How would attacking civilians generate money? Oh, and what civilians are we talking about? :rolleyes:
CPU: Phenom II X6 T1090 @ 3,85GHz
Memory: 8Gb DDR3 1600MHz
Graphics: XFX HD5870 XT
Mobo: ASUS Crosshair Formula IV
Monitor: Asus 22" 2ms @ 1680x1050
Case: Lian Li V2000 Fulltower
PSU: Corsair VX550W

#2233 morsematten

morsematten
  • Members
  • 238 posts
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 16 March 2008 - 01:29 PM

innocent people.
I'm the nut cracker, and i'll crack your nuts.

#2234 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 16 March 2008 - 06:32 PM

How would attacking civilians generate money?

Usual GLA Cash Bounty power.

#2235 PeeWee

PeeWee

    Title unavailable

  • Members
  • 351 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  •  Why so serious error?

Posted 17 March 2008 - 12:15 PM

innocent people.


Those people running around? They dont exist in many maps...

How would attacking civilians generate money?

Usual GLA Cash Bounty power.


Yes, but strategically? How would for example Al-Quaida make money that way? Wouldn't they just loose their peoples support?
CPU: Phenom II X6 T1090 @ 3,85GHz
Memory: 8Gb DDR3 1600MHz
Graphics: XFX HD5870 XT
Mobo: ASUS Crosshair Formula IV
Monitor: Asus 22" 2ms @ 1680x1050
Case: Lian Li V2000 Fulltower
PSU: Corsair VX550W

#2236 Creator

Creator

    The cat

  • Hosted
  • 3,632 posts
  • Location:Moscow, Russia
  • Projects:Contra

Posted 18 March 2008 - 07:59 AM

Yes, but strategically? How would for example Al-Quaida make money that way? Wouldn't they just loose their peoples support?

Holy war against infidels.

#2237 PeeWee

PeeWee

    Title unavailable

  • Members
  • 351 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  •  Why so serious error?

Posted 18 March 2008 - 07:07 PM

So this will be implemented? Isn't it enough with the '10/20/30% enemy value at kill'-power?
CPU: Phenom II X6 T1090 @ 3,85GHz
Memory: 8Gb DDR3 1600MHz
Graphics: XFX HD5870 XT
Mobo: ASUS Crosshair Formula IV
Monitor: Asus 22" 2ms @ 1680x1050
Case: Lian Li V2000 Fulltower
PSU: Corsair VX550W

#2238 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 20 March 2008 - 06:26 AM

Couldn't poisons be also made removable by burning them? In most cases, poisons are burned by napalm. So couldn't they be availiable to be burned in contra too? Only poisons could be burned away, not acids, silicon clouds or radiation.

#2239 Guest_Kossumies6_*

Guest_Kossumies6_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2008 - 09:52 AM

Just wondering, couldn't all GLA generals be able to build militia from their command vehiecles? The militia would be armed with an AK-47, wouldn't be able to take much damage or do much damage, run faster than regular infantry, would be cheap and fast to produce, would be able to capture buildins, they would become invisible after the rebel camoflage would be built and they could plant TNTs after the boody trap would be researched.
They would be an ok rushing unit, assist in defence and offence, quickly scout grounds in early game and reach and capture the tech buildings faster. And perhaps later in the game to strike stealthly to unprotected areas.

#2240 gam3_link

gam3_link
  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 06 April 2008 - 12:04 PM

good idea, it will make the GLA much stronger to rush in early game. i like it. :shiftee:




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users