3930 replies to this topic

[Phoenix911]

I don't want dead units staying on the field maybe for a short time but if u have a long game and unitsstay dead on the field it will effect proformance.

[Phoenix911]

A medievil weapon LMAO no offence but i think thats the most retarded idea i read in a long time....

Even terroests in todays world has access to modern weapons from the ww2 onwards possably even some old ww1 weapons could be found but very rare.

[Capt.Drake]

Air controll tower, I think that would be quite nice but the I dea needs some working

but when dead units stay on hte filed you got a big problem , I know it from my map Mountain Conflict, so forget about it as fast as possible

[Phoenix911]

how about a super long rang anti air missle lancher for china side and Sw gen since she has bad anti air weapons. also can you make it so avengers shoot ground units, it doesn't have to be strong or anything but it would hlp it stay alive. also tankgen and nuke gen red gaurds don't come out 2 by 2.

Creator i don't think will add a sam site for SW gen cos pend has already got one in remix for her, and since pend shares everything with creator so he can use if he choose too then it unlikely he will if not in contra5.

Avengaers are AA not ground fighting vehicals if you want them to live longer then put them with a group of ground units. There support units AA and target designator to help your units be more accurate and so forth.

[Death_Pheonix]

i have 2 suggestions, but i don't know if there possible, so bear with me!


1. make multiple buildings and defenses selectable at once, so you can put like 4 barracks in a team, and make the process of mass-producing units easier.


2. this one is more of a opinion but here goes, change the model of demos aircrafts, i personally think they ruin the feel of the mod, i suggest changing the from a guy riding a missile to a heavily modified biplane, with welded metal plates, airframes and rocket boosters on them (same roles and damage just different looks)


i know generals is not meant not be realistic, but its not meant to be super Mario smash brothers either

[Bozopof]

ah aight! btw dont you think that Robo general should have a Cybernetic "Hero"? i mean Col.burton. and it shouldn't need any ambulances, cuz when there is no fleshy human infantry theres no need of ambulance. also the construction dozer should become a Contruction Drone...a small faster version of old dozer that is cheaper but weaker.

also i think adding a "USA technology general" "GLA scavenger(marauder) general" and "China artillery general" can be a good idea...

[Phoenix911]

and it shouldn't need any ambulances, cuz when there is no fleshy human infantry theres no need of ambulance.

Do you know what a cyborg is?
A cyborg is a human body that has been enharnced using electronics and other such means, U can't keep a cyborg running simply by maintaining there electronics u still need to maintain the body. A cyborg would most likly still have a human brain aswell as heart/lungs and other such organs aswell as kidneys to keep the blood nontoxic, blood would be needed to move oxgen thought the body.
No matter how hightech something becomes u wont ever change the way the human body requires oxgen.

[Pendaelose]

also the construction dozer should become a Contruction Drone...a small faster version of old dozer that is cheaper but weaker.

I've thaught about this a bunch of times... I'm still always tempted to do it.

[Phoenix911]

The dozer is fine imo, it would be nice to change it possably.
BUT what is stopping a cyborg driving a dozer?
It could happen.

[Pendaelose]

The dozer is fine imo, it would be nice to change it possably.
BUT what is stopping a cyborg driving a dozer?
It could happen.

obviously one of Strogified Rangers is driving it!

I do like the idea of a Standard Drone as a dozer, and a walking unit for the adv dozer. I almost made the walking one a few times, I just never liked the way it looked... but I might give it another try.

[Phoenix911]

The dozer is fine imo, it would be nice to change it possably.
BUT what is stopping a cyborg driving a dozer?
It could happen.

obviously one of Strogified Rangers is driving it!

I do like the idea of a Standard Drone as a dozer, and a walking unit for the adv dozer. I almost made the walking one a few times, I just never liked the way it looked... but I might give it another try.

Well would it not be cheeper for a cyber general to simply modify the dozers to be drone/ai controled?
Maybe u should keep the basic dozer and add a small like antena or somethign to it to give it a drone feel... BUT not one of them lil gaurdian drone looking things.

And the advance dozer why not make a 2 legged one that has more tougher thicker legs to show it being less mobile but more stronger to hold the construction mechanic devise, Add a crain on it maybe haha

[olli]

you could adapt the body of the anti tank/infantry mechs, and where its guns go, have some welders or, building tools. i would like to see that. it would fit nicely for cyber

[Pendaelose]

you could adapt the body of the anti tank/infantry mechs, and where its guns go, have some welders or, building tools. i would like to see that. it would fit nicely for cyber

Thats the plan.

[olli]

only do it after every thing else that is important is done. as it is not essential. we dont want you getting side tracked pend!

[ORCACommander]

I have 5 suggestions:

1. Reduce the Retaliators Effectiveness and Damage radius against Aircraft and IMO horribly imbalanced

2. Give all USA Ranger based infantry the ability to use an M-203 Frag and M-203 HE. The HE would allow them to stand better against tanks that try to run them over and the frag would create added survivability to a few rangers combating an infantry rush early game. both of these should have minimal affects towards buildings. The projectile for these would fly in a straight line like a rocket and be mildly inaccurate.

3. The M-203 flash bang grenades the already come with do not go fast enough and should not arc at all as the do go in a straight line.

4. The Nuke general has a good back ground image and torso but his face is ridiculous. and needs replacing to something frightening yes but not something as silly as that.

5. Berta needs a strict build limit. I suggest 2-3.

[Ubermedic]

1. Reduce the Retaliators Effectiveness and Damage radius against Aircraft and IMO horribly imbalanced

Reduce them more?
Aircraft always were and always have been fragile.
Try using a better strategy (B-52s make great holes in defense)

2. Give all USA Ranger based infantry the ability to use an M-203 Frag and M-203 HE. The HE would allow them to stand better against tanks that try to run them over and the frag would create added survivability to a few rangers combating an infantry rush early game. both of these should have minimal affects towards buildings. The projectile for these would fly in a straight line like a rocket and be mildly inaccurate.

Woah. That's why you have Rocket Soldiers.
Mix Rockets and Rangers for Max effect.
This would just trivialize the Rockets existence.

3. The M-203 flash bang grenades the already come with do not go fast enough and should not arc at all as the do go in a straight line.

Ever fired an M203? They're not as straight forward as you might have seen.
They require quite an arc to obtain maximum efficiency range.

4. The Nuke general has a good back ground image and torso but his face is ridiculous. and needs replacing to something frightening yes but not something as silly as that.

His face is supposed to be ridiculous. I mean. All that radiation. I bet he's sterile too.

5. Berta needs a strict build limit. I suggest 2-3.

Don't let you enemies build any.
Or don't let them get into an effective firing range of your units.
Besides should the Aurora also have a strict build limit?
What about so many other sides uber units?

[Medik]

Word
Im going to start stalking you now ubermedic

Edited by Medik, 18 January 2007 - 02:08 AM.