Lol, I think we shouldn't overlook the whole faction just to see what the hero relates to. I know it seems appropriate in that manner, but Mirkwood and fire? NO. Also, did Elrond have the Ring of Fire during the War of the Ring or the Angmar Invasion? Same question would apply to Galadriel.Elrond had the ring of air...
Elves
#161
Posted 10 May 2008 - 02:58 PM
#162
Posted 10 May 2008 - 03:00 PM
But still...Galadriel's ring was what kept Lorien from aging much and was what seemed to stop time there. So I don't think you should just discount it out of hand
My political compass
There's a story that the grass is so green...what did I see? Where have I been?
#163
Posted 10 May 2008 - 09:31 PM
Edited by Fyro11, 10 May 2008 - 09:32 PM.
#164
Posted 10 May 2008 - 09:35 PM
My political compass
There's a story that the grass is so green...what did I see? Where have I been?
#165
Posted 10 May 2008 - 09:42 PM
And Cirdan gave it to Gandalf upon his arrival to Middle-earth.
Cheers,
-mike
#166
Posted 27 May 2008 - 12:39 AM
Okay, I know that Cirdan was a shipwright (sp?) and I can understand why you gave him a water based-power. But from my experience, it doesn't work on watery terrains. Maybe I'm wrong.... Now, I know that Cirdan did give away his Ring to Gandalf. But I really think that Cirdan should get a fire-based power. I'm going to get back to this....
So I think that you should give Galadriel, Cirdan's water-spout power (after it's fixed/modified) to replace her Tornado power (because it's an air-elemental power... plus Elrond already has it) and you could give Cirdan a fire-based level 10 power. As well as maybe a leadership that buffs ships or something...
For a fire-based power for Cirdan, maybe you could give him something similar to Drogoth's "Firestrike" power? Because I don't think that scorching the battlefield temporarily is really that creative (but it could be an idea to fall-back on, if all else fails). If it's a level 10 power, I think that it could start out like Drogoth's "Firestrike" power but it ends up like a more powerful Gorgoroth Spire fireball. I don't think that made much sense, so I hope you know what I mean....
Lastly, I just remembered that you gave the 3 elves "Ring" powers that work exactly like Istari Light. I think that you guys could consider making these powers elemental. By this I mean that Elrond would shoot out a powerful beam of "Air" (like the Air Sorcerer) and Galadriel would shoot out a buffed beam of water, etc.
Edited by Scryer, 27 May 2008 - 01:45 AM.
#167
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:06 AM
But not afterwords, no.
#168
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:18 AM
I wouldn't be against Cirdan having a fire-based power in the Last Alliance prologue mission, or in any that happened before Gandalf arrived in Middle-earth.
But not afterwords, no.
Well, it's not like Gandalf has any fire-based powers at the moment. And I don't know about you or anyone else, but I think that Gandalf's powers are pretty good (by this I mean like power/balance-wise) so it wouldn't be like Gandalf would be using Narya in any of his powers. Not only that but time is so messed up since ROTWK was made that you could get away with giving Cirdan a permanent fire-based power. And he's part of the Arnor faction if I remember correctly, and I think that a time-frame is pretty messed up with that faction as well (because of ROTWK, to b/c of you guys).
In the end, if Gandalf isn't using it at all as a hero, then I think that Cirdan should be the one who could use its powers.
Edited by Scryer, 27 May 2008 - 02:20 AM.
#169
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:23 AM
And, no, you can't "get away" with it. Not with what's planned for the Rj campaign.
#170
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:27 AM
#171
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:31 AM
Even though he wasn't in possession of the Ring of Fire at the time of the War of the Ring. And as for it's "powers", the Ring itself was even less suited to combat than the other Two - it's purpose was to inspire others to greater deeds, not to set fire to ground or light foes aflame.
And, no, you can't "get away" with it. Not with what's planned for the Rj campaign.
Yeah I know that there is going to be a seperate Epilogue campaign with the mod. So would Arnor then be completely removed from the WOTR (I mean linear and non-linear by this) campaign? It sounds like it since you're concerned about time-frame and whatnot.
Wow, I didn't know that it wasn't suited for combat. My semantic memory has gone down the drain... Well, then maybe it could be given to Cirdan as a better leadership ability then? Like it could be a leadership ability better than most. By this I mean that it could prevent nearby allies from fleeing in fear as well as boost stats. I'm sure that the elves would look up to him as a ring-bearing leader even though he gave his ring away. <That really didn't make much sense but I hope that you know what I mean.
Edited by Scryer, 27 May 2008 - 02:35 AM.
#172
Posted 27 May 2008 - 02:40 AM
Personally, I don't have a problem with Cirdan gaining a better leadership..but not due to the Ring, at least not for War of the Ring -era missions. That said, I obviously wouldn't have a problem if he did possess the Ring during the Fall of Arnor.
#173
Posted 27 May 2008 - 08:15 PM
This is off topic now though
My political compass
There's a story that the grass is so green...what did I see? Where have I been?
#174
Posted 27 July 2008 - 09:00 PM
#175
Posted 31 July 2008 - 05:38 AM
#176
Posted 31 July 2008 - 06:38 AM
#177
Posted 31 July 2008 - 09:43 PM
Edited by Crazy Intellectual Liberal, 31 July 2008 - 09:45 PM.
#178
Posted 01 August 2008 - 02:50 AM
My political compass
There's a story that the grass is so green...what did I see? Where have I been?
#179
Posted 14 August 2008 - 08:17 PM
And no, I'm not refferring to the same toggle he does have in BFME2, which is the temporary one.
#180
Posted 14 August 2008 - 08:27 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users